I’ve spent the last month or two asking everyone I spoke with the same simple question.
“What is anaphylaxis?”
The responses have had a disturbing uniformity.
“An extreme allergic reaction from a bee sting, bug bite, or food allergy.”
Although each were asked separately, my contacts returned a consensus opinion with zero deviation. Yup, they all had the same definition and were all completely mistaken. Shockingly enough, consensus logic, otherwise known as inductive arguments, are simply not valid as proof of anything. Someone inform Neal Degrasse Tyson, please. I’m sure he’ll want to know this breaking 4,000 year old news right away! Oops, tangent-ed once again.
So, what is the correct definition? The published definition is,
hypersensitivity (as to foreign proteins or drugs) resulting from sensitization following prior contact with the causative agent
but that write up is missing so many details, I’d suggest that at the very least, tit’s a lie by omission. As is, it makes it sound like one can get anaphylaxis from randomly happening upon something twice in a lifetime, so long as that something is one of those evil causative agents. You know like a Russian spy.
What it should say is “a potentially fatal vulnerability to any contact with a specific protein, induced via injection or similar medical intervention, taking affect 21 days after injection and likely lasting for the rest of the recipient’s life.”
So what? Why does it matter that the definition wasn’t 100% correct and what the hell does that have to do with public health, you idiotic anti-vaxxer?
Good question, thank you for asking. well, this process is the reason behind the last 100 years of public health. The implementation of the potential to kill a percentage of the population with every newly patented prick, with no one knowing they were poisoned, was the process we’ve been ironically calling public health for over a century now. Let’s break this down.
1900- The Pseudoscience of Eugenics begins it meteoric rise, reaching penultimate popularity in the late 1930’s. After which it waited nearly a century before humanity would grow stupid and self important enough to forget how ridiculous its proponents really were and start experimenting with eugenics again. Note- For those who do not know, Eugenics has nothing to do with worshipping Eugene Levy. It predates his birth by decades and I believe his followers are called Levites. I may be wrong about that, so don’t quote me there, but he is really funny.
1913- The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine1 goes to that dick, Charles Robert Richet for his work on puppy murdering.. I mean… Anaphylaxis. Which is what he called his particular brand of puppy murdering. Probably because he was French.
1945- The most expensive and famous, to date , eugenics experiment draws to a close as the Red Army turns Berlin into a wide flat open plain2.
Back to 1913.
Excerpt- 1913 Nobel Prize Presenter’s Speech prior to giving Richter the award-
”Richet has lifted this problem of hypersensitivity to toxins on to a new plane. In 1902 he published, in collaboration with Portier, the first work on this subject. Later, in a series of studies collected in the monograph L’Anaphylaxie of 1912, Richet – unaided – confirmed and expanded this discovery.
He experimented with several protein toxins, of animal and vegetable origin. If one of these toxins is injected beneath the skin of the test animals, in such a small dose that the subjects do not react, and if the injection is repeated after an interval of two or three weeks with an equally weak dose, this is almost always followed, sometimes even during the second injection, by the most violent toxic symptoms. These can cause the death of the animal in a few minutes, or else the animal is seen to recover completely and with equal rapidity. The toxic state in this case is nearly always markedly transitory.
This violent reaction, similar to shock, is in no way due to the second dose being added to possible toxic traces of a former dosage. It was quite simple to prove that such was not the case. If the two doses are given at one session, or at a brief interval, or even four or five days apart, there are no toxic effects. There must always be a certain preparation, a period of incubation before the toxin injected has time to cause hypersensitivity in the organism.
This hypersensitivity that Richet found does not correspond with the sporadic cases of hypersensitivity found by Behring in horses immunized against diphtheria. The hypersensitivity of Richet is not fortuitous; it is constant and produced with the same regularity as diminished susceptibility produced by immunization. Richet calls this hypersensitivity with regard to toxins, anaphylaxis, in contrast to phylaxis or prophylaxis, meaning protection.”
Yes, while most average, unimaginative and honor bound doctors were working on giving people immunity to diseases, Richter went all in on finding ways to fuck people up. In fact, he want so hard core on this concept, he won the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine as ironically as Obama would later earn his.
Yeah, but what does that have to do with public health and vaccination, nerd?
One more quote from that presenter’s speech-
“In 1888 – in other words well before serum treatment, which is now so generally used in the fight against different contagious diseases, was known – Richet had proved that immunity could be transferred experimentally from one animal to another not so far immunized by injecting blood serum of the first into the second, in other words by passive immunization. Richet’s next step was to find out whether these findings on passive immunization were equally applicable to anaphylaxis, and in fact he demonstrated that anaphylactic hypersensitivity could be transferred from one animal to another by the injection of blood serum from the animal anaphylactized. This fact could serve as a basis for methods aimed at ascertaining, e.g., in man, if an ailment suspected of being anaphylactic was in fact so or not. As to the bearing of anaphylaxis on pathology, it was naturally of prime importance.”
In other words, in 1888, long before the advent of mass vaccination and public health, Richter had already worked out exactly how to use otherwise completely harmless proteins in injections in order to induce seemingly unrelated suffering and death in humans. Those seemingly harmless proteins have been included as ingredients in every vaccination the FDA has ever approved. They never explained why those proteins were added to the shots, but since we all believed the were harmless, no one really cared. Now we know that they are not harmless, so why else do you think they put them in there?
The process of anaphylaxis was well known enough and considered to have had such a significant impact on the practice of medicine by that time, that it was awarded the Nobel Price in Medicine. Closely following that award, the early mass vaccination campaigns were rolled out using those same proteins as necessary ingredients and the same time in between sequencing. To this day, the protein additions and the 2-3 week timeframes still govern our vaccination campaigns. Remember what was required to be fully vaccinated for Covid 19? Yes, 1 shot followed by another at least 21 days later3. Then additional shots were added with similar waiting periods in between. Why? You guessed it. If they did not get you the first time, they were fully planning to just keep trying forever.
Author’s note- I would know nothing about this topic if it weren’t for 2 writers… researchers… to be honest, they really are heroes (Truly. See Below4) named Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt. In fact, my whole purpose in writing this post was to hopefully make others curious enough about the subject to follow these links, go to their Substack pages, and read the in depth coverage they have published there. They have the receipts and all the details. God speed and good luck on your coming education!
and
The amount of time and effort they put in on this subject is amazing, and for what? For you, me, and the health and well being of humanity. That’s all, I can see. This work could possibly get them killed and most definitely won’t help them in any way financially. So yeah. That qualifies as heroes.
Some points on this process.
The first is that it wouldn't be a very clever population control plan long term.
It selectively breeds two groups, the groups who take it become hypoallergenic, the one's that don't are less susceptible to propaganda and more intelligent.
Both groups get more difficult to kill with the method as time proceeds, requiring ever more potent propaganda and ever more toxic injections.
Naturally, this increases its visibility, leading to both diminishing returns and higher risk.
Perhaps this is why covid happened: we are approaching the end of the methods life cycle.
But it's hard for me to believe that the architects of the disaster were unaware that it wouldn't work forever.
Suggesting that the actual goal was to breed skeptical humans who don't trust the authorities.
Or hypoallergenic people that could be used for transhumanism. However, if it was the latter, they could legally mandate it. But instead they have left it possible to refuse.
Likewise, the globalists start wars and use propaganda to incite those with nationalist leanings to fight and die in them.
But they provide an escape route for refugees to flee the war and survive, effectively breeding resistance to nationalist ideology and propaganda.
I'm curious to know what you believe the long term objective is.